Legal Opinion
State v. Vakilzaden
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 15, 2005No. SC 17246PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NORCOTT, J.
This is the state’s second appeal 1 from the judgment of the trial court granting the motion of the defendant, Anthony Vakilzaden, to dismiss an information charging him with one count of custodial interference in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-97, 2 and one count of conspiracy to commit custodial interference in the first degree in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-48 3 and 53a-97 (a) (2). The charges arose from allegations that the defendant had aided and abetted his nephew, Orang Fabriz, in interfering with the custodial rights of Fabriz’ wife,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. LanierSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- State v. KellySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Flint v. Universal Machine Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Marshak v. MarshakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Batte-Holmgren v. Commissioner of Public HealthSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- State v. PaulingConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- State v. BrunettiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- State v. MorquechoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- State v. KurzatkowskiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.