Legal Opinion
Martin v. ALUMAX OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC.
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided June 24, 2005No. CUV,A,2:03-3878-SBPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BLATT, Senior District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
This matter is before the Court on the Plaintiffs’ complaint, alleging age discrimination under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, with specific reference to 29 U.S.C. § 623(a). The complaint alleged multiple instances of age discrimination in that one or both Plaintiffs were denied promotion to a specified position. The record includes the April 11, 2005, Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge George C. Kosko, which recommended that the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment be granted. The Report and…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Davenport v. Anne Arundel County Board of EducationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2014
- Colebrooke v. T-MobileDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2021