Legal Opinion

De Mers v. Rohan

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 8, 1905PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Woodbury District Court.- — ■ Hon. Geo. W. WaKeeield, Judge. Action to recover damages caused by trespassing cattle. ' From judgment as prayed, defendant appeals.—

1Opinion of the Court

Ladd, J.—

1‘ sencST par-The farm of Fortin, occupied by plaintiff as tenant, joins that of defendant on the south. A railroad runs through both- farms. Defendant" built the line fence from the railroad to the west, and Fortin or his grantor that to the east. But the evidence fails to establish any agreement between them as to what portion each should erect or maintain. The only *489evidence on tbis snbj eet is that of defendant, vího testified: “ I bad an arrangement tbrongb tbe renters as to wbicb part of tbe fence I sbonld maintain. Mine was west of tbe railroad track, and bis was east. I bnilt…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rust v. LowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1809
  2. Turner v. HitchcockSupreme Court of Iowa · 1866
  3. Wagner v. BissellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1856
  4. Myers v. DoddIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
  5. Osborne v. KimballSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sinnott v. District Court of Clarke CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  2. Osgood v. NamesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
  3. Kobayashi v. StrangewayWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Foster v. BusseySupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  5. McAfee v. WalkerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API