Myers v. Dodd
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Lawrence Court of Common Pleas.
1Opinion of the CourtGookins, J.
The facts appearing in evidence, and by the verdict, were, that Dodd and Myers were adjoining land owners. Their lands had been separated by a partition fence; but a-part of it had been carried away by high water, about a year before the trespass complained of, and it was otherwise dilapidated. Myers being aware of the condition of the fence, turned his cattle in upon his adjoining close, whence they escaped into the field of Dodd, and destroyed his corn; for which injury Dodd brought this action,, and recovered.
The question of Myers’s liability upon this state of facts is reserved upon…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cited by26 opinions
- Tomlinson v. BainakaIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
- Indianapolis, Cincinnati, & Lafayette Railroad v. HarterIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
- Welch v. BowenIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Jackson v. FultonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1901
- O'Riley v. DissMissouri Court of Appeals · 1890
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.