Legal Opinion
James E. Dremann v. Frank Francis People of California
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 18, 1987No. 86-2638PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Per curiam
Dremann appeals the district court’s dismissal of his habeas corpus petition for want of subject matter jurisdiction. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.
I
Dremann is an attorney who has been admitted to practice in California for thirteen years. He was cited for contempt by a California state trial judge for ignoring a court order to limit the scope of cross-examination of a witness in a criminal case Dremann was defending. Following an evidentiary hearing, Dremann was sentenced to pay a fine of $500. Although the California Appellate and Supreme Courts denied…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hensley v. Municipal Court, San Jose-Milpitas Judicial Dist., Santa Clara Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Gilbert Manly Spring v. Harry Caldwell, Chief of Police, City of Houston, State of Texas, Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- John S. Edmunds v. Robert Won Bae Chang, Individually and in His Capacity as Judge, First Circuit Court, State of HawaiiCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1975
- Redding Ford v. California State Board of EqualizationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
3Cited by43 opinions
- Bailey v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Elbert W. Williamson v. Christine O. GregoireCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Hubert MichaudCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Erlandson v. Northglenn Municipal CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Barry v. Bergen County Probation DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.