Legal Opinion
Erlandson v. Northglenn Municipal Court
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 10, 2008No. 08-1056PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRISCOE, Circuit Judge.
Peter Erlandson, appearing pro se, appeals the orders entered by the district court dismissing his amended complaint and denying his motion to amend or alter judgment. Exercising jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we affirm.
I. Background.
In his amended complaint, Mr. Erland-son asserted that the district court had jurisdiction over his case pursuant to “[t]he [United States] Constitution,” and he characterized his action as a “Petition For A Constitutional Review.” R., Doc. 5 at 2, 3. Mr. Erlandson further alleged that: (1) he was charged, tried, and convicted of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- United States v. Edward RossCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- Mays v. DinwiddieCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Calhoun v. Colorado Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. RutiglianoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
- Valdez v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2012
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.