Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Dayton Power & Light Co. v. Riley

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1978No. 77-914PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue before this court is the availability of the writ of prohibition. To determine this, it is necessary to state some of the allegations raised in the cause in the trial court which relator would prohibit.

The litigation which relator would have prohibited commenced on May 20, 1977, when Irwin filed suit in the Court of Common Pleas of Clinton County on behalf of itself and others similarly situated.

*169Irwin alleged that during the winter of 1976-77, non-domestic natural gas customers of Dayton Power & Light Company were faced with rapidly diminishing allowable usages. The company offered…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Southgate Development Corp. v. Columbia Gas Transmission Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
  2. State Ex Rel. Carmody v. JusticeOhio Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Milligan v. Ohio Bell Telephone Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State ex rel. Illuminating Co. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Allstate Insurance v. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Farra v. City of DaytonOhio Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Dayton Communications Corp. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1980

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API