Williams v. Anderson

Opinion

POHLMAN, Judge:

¶ 1 In this interlocutory appeal, plaintiff Jacob D. Williams appeals the district court’s grant of á motion, in limine preventing him from presenting damages-related evidence at trial. Challenging the basis for the court’s ruling, Williams contends that he adequately disclosed “a computation of any damages claimed” for purposes of rule 26 of the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure when he disclosed that he sought damages amounting to 30% of the purchase price of the company that he once co-owned with Craig Alan Anderson and Quinn Zite. We agree and therefore reverse and…