Legal Opinion
City & County of San Francisco v. Tutor-Saliba Corp.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided October 2, 2003No. C-02-5286 CW (EMC)PublishedCited by 63 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER SUPPLEMENT TO PLAINTIFFS’ RULE 26(a)(1)(C) DISCLOSURE; DENYING DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE OF THE JUNE 5, 2003 SAN FRANCISCO DAILY JOURNAL ARTICLE (Docket No. 90)
CHEN, United States Magistrate Judge.
Defendants move to compel Plaintiffs to further supplement the Rule 26(a) disclosures regarding damages. Having reviewed the parties’ briefs and accompanying submissions, having considered the oral argument of counsel on September 17, 2003, and good cause appearing therefor, the Court hereby GRANTS Defendants’ motion and orders…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bullard v. Roadway ExpressCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Monroig v. RMM Records & Video Corp.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2000
- Pine Ridge Recycling, Inc. v. Butts CountyDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 1995
3Cited by63 opinions
- Design Strategy, Inc. v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Design Strategy, Inc. v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Silvagni v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2017
- Sender v. MannDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2004
- OHC Liquidation Trust v. Credit Suisse First Boston (In Re Oakwood Homes Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2006
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.