Legal Opinion

Blackwell v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 18, 1935No. 8 Div. 121PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, Chief Justice.

The body of the act (Gen. Acts 1931, p. 806) is cognate or germane to the title and does not offend section 45 of the Constitution of 1901. The main purpose of the bill, as expressed in the title, was to suppress the evils of gambling devices, to define same, to provide for the seizure and destruction of same, and the body of the bill so conforms to the general purpose as expressed in the title as not to violate section 45 of the Constitution.

It is true that said act as finally adopted is much broader than the bill as originally introduced and much more comprehensive…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Alabama State Bridge Corporation v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  2. Stein v. LeeperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
  3. Hall v. SteeleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
  2. Eccles v. StoneSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
  3. Gafford v. PembertonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  4. Magee v. BoydSupreme Court of Alabama · 2015
  5. Hurvich v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API