Legal Opinion

Harnetty v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 2019No. S-18-0129PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOX, Justice.

[¶1] Paul Michael Harnetty was an OB/GYN in Casper, Wyoming. A jury convicted him of sexually assaulting two of his patients. He contends that there was insufficient evidence to convict him, the district court erred when it denied his proposed theory of defense *370instruction, and the court erred when it denied his W.R.Cr.P. 34 motion for arrest of judgment. We affirm.

ISSUES

[¶2] We rephrase the issues as:

1. Did the State present sufficient evidence that Dr. Harnetty was in a "position of authority"?1

2. Did the district court err when it rejected Dr. Harnetty's proposed theory of…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Scadden v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Bouwkamp v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Shey Elan BruceWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Derek Earl Hill v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Miranda Rose Mraz v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2016

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hopkins v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Miguel Rolando Bernal-Molina v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2021
  3. Wyoming State Hospital and State of Wyoming v. Mary Romine and Donald Romine, as Guardians and Conservators for and On Behalf of Justina Case, Their WardWyoming Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Yolanda Varela v. Goshen County Fairgrounds, a Wyoming governmental entityWyoming Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Marty May Smith v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2021

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API