Legal Opinion

Graham v. . Wall

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 8, 1941PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARKSON, J., writing for the Court, is of the opinion that the general contractor is also liable under the provisions of ch. 120, sec. 19, Public Laws 1929, Michie's Code, 8081 (aa), upon the theory that ch. 358, Public Laws 1941, is not an amendment changing the Act of 1929, but is in reality an amendment clarifying the legislative intent under the former statute.

2DissentBarnhill, J.

STACY, C. J., and WINBORNE, J., concur in dissent. This was a claim under the Workmen's Compensation Act, in which the claimant sought compensation for injuries which he alleged were caused by an accident which occurred on 16…

3Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Asheville Hosiery Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. Beach v. . McLeanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  3. Aderholt v. . CondonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  4. McGill v. Town of LumbertonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Maxwell v. BeckTennessee Supreme Court · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by19 opinions

  1. Gateway Construction Company v. WallbaumCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1962
  2. Bye v. Interstate Granite Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  3. Askew v. LEONARD TIRE COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  4. Scott v. Waccamaw Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  5. Pearson v. PEERLESS FLOORING COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API