Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Chauffeurs, Teamsters and Helpers, Local Union 238 v. C.R.S.T., Inc. (Sic)

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 16, 1986No. 85-1301Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partLay, Chief Judge

I dissent.

I

Although I agree that once impasse in negotiations has been reached, an employer has the right to unilaterally institute terms and conditions of employment and in doing so is not bound to those contained in the expired agreement, the majority’s analysis completely ignores the principle that an employer may act unilaterally after impasse only if its action is reasonably comprehended within its preimpasse bargaining proposals. United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO v. Fort Pitt Steel Casting Division-Conval-Penn, Inc., 635 F.2d 1071, 1078 (3rd Cir.1980) (citing NLRB v.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Nolde Bros., Inc. v. Local No. 358, Bakery & Confectionery Workers UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Crompton-Highland Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Landro v. Glendenning Motorways, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
  4. Johnson Controls, Inc. v. City of Cedar Rapids, IowaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
  5. Taft Broadcasting Co., Wdaf Am-Fm-Tv v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API