Legal Opinion

Deblasio v. Johnson

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided October 25, 2000No. CIV. A. 99-1818-AM, CIV. A. 99-1859-AM, CIV. A. 00-18-AM, CIV. A. 00-170-AM, CIV. A. 00-211-AMPublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HILTON, District Judge.

This case involves several constitutional and statutory challenges to the new Virginia Department of Corrections (‘VDOC”) inmate grooming standards regulation, Division of Operations Procedure 864 (“DOP 864”). Plaintiffs are inmates in the Virginia prison system who filed this consolidated pro se action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, in order to launch a facial challenge to DOP 864 on First Amendment, Fourth Amendment, Eighth Amendment, Fourteenth Amendment, and Religious Freedom Restoration Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000bb to 2000bb-4 (“RFRA”), grounds. Plaintiffs have also…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Warsoldier v. WoodfordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  2. Warsoldier v. WoodfordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  3. Mills v. HolmesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2015
  4. Oliver v. PowellDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2002
  5. Jonathan Henslee v. Alvin KellerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API