Legal Opinion

Converse v. Kenyon

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1965No. 35796PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrower, J.

George N. Converse, Berlea D. Converse, Grace C. Blake, Roy A. Blake, James P. Converse, and Helen M. Converse, the plaintiffs herein, brought this action in the district court for Brown County, Nebraska, against the defendants Guy E. Kenyon, Edna Kenyon, Herbert Kenyon, and Ruth Kenyon, to correctly establish the comers and boundaries of Section 4, Township 30 North, Range 23 West of the 6th P.M., in Brown County, Nebraska, under section 34-301, R. R. S. 1943.

George N. Converse, Grace C. Blake, and James P. Converse are the record owners of the southwest quarter of said section and will be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Purdum v. ShermanNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Hallowell v. BorchersNebraska Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Wells v. TietgeNebraska Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Mentzer v. DolenNebraska Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Martin v. MartinNebraska Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Meyer v. EllisWyoming Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Gustin v. ScheeleNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Petsch v. WidgerNebraska Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Scott v. GublerIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
  5. McCain v. CookNebraska Supreme Court · 1969

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API