T.M. v. M.Z.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The issue in this case is whether an appeal taken from the entry of a personal protection order (PPO) is rendered moot solely due to the expiration of the PPO. We hold that the PPO's expiration alone does not render the appeal moot, and we remand to the Court of Appeals for further proceedings.
Petitioner TM and respondent MZ1 are neighbors. Petitioner sought a *474PPO against respondent under MCL 600.2950a(1), pointing to a variety of Facebook posts in which petitioner alleged that respondent was harassing petitioner. Petitioner asked the trial court to issue the order ex parte…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Anway v. Grand Rapids Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1920
- James v. AlbertsMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
- Gildemeister v. LindsayMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
- East Grand Rapids School District v. Kent County Tax Allocation BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
3Cited by28 opinions
- People v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 2018
- TM v. MZMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
- Bs v. JbMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019
- Can IV Packard Square LLC v. Packard Square LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019
- City of Detroit v. Nationwide Recovery IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2021
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.