Legal Opinion
Baltimore & O. R. v. Clark
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided February 4, 1932No. 1989PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM C. COLEMAN, District Judge.
This is a proceeding brought by a bill in equity under the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act of March 4, 1927, 44 Stat. 1424 (33 USCA § 901 et seq.) to set aside, as not being in accordance with law, an order of the Deputy Commissioner awarding certain compensation to one of complainant’s employees.
In a proceeding of this kind, this court is confined to a review of the testimony presented to the Deputy Commissioner, and cannot disturb his findings if there was competent evidence to support them. Wheeling Corrugating Co. v. McManigal (C. C.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lane v. Horn & Hardart Baking Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
- Slacum v. JolleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
- Wheeling Corrugating Co. v. McManigalCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1930
- Claim of Hughes v. Trustees of St. Patrick's CathedralNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Miskowiak v. Bethlehem Steel Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1929
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- La Rue v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1943
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. HoageCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1936
- Lumbermen's Mut. Casualty Co. v. LoweDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1933
- Spratt v. CrowellDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1933
- Chausse v. LoweDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1938