Holley v. California Department of Corrections
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CLIFTON, Circuit Judge:
State prisoner Patrick Ronald Holley, Sr., appeals from the district court’s summary judgment in favor of defendant prison officials. Holley alleges in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action that California Department of Corrections grooming regulations requiring short hair imposed a substantial burden on his exercise of religion in violation of section 3 of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000 (RLUIPA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000cc-l. He seeks damages from defendants in their official capacities. We must decide whether the acceptance of federal prison funding by…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hafer v. MeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. Nordic Village, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Lane v. PenaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- College Savings Bank v. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by121 opinions
- Sossamon v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Dennis Walker v. BeardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Blackie Alvarez v. Jean HillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Jachetta v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Garnica v. Washington Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2013
116 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.