Legal Opinion

Holley v. California Department of Corrections

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 5, 2010No. 07-15552PublishedCited by 121 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLIFTON, Circuit Judge:

State prisoner Patrick Ronald Holley, Sr., appeals from the district court’s summary judgment in favor of defendant prison officials. Holley alleges in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action that California Department of Corrections grooming regulations requiring short hair imposed a substantial burden on his exercise of religion in violation of section 3 of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000 (RLUIPA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000cc-l. He seeks damages from defendants in their official capacities. We must decide whether the acceptance of federal prison funding by…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hafer v. MeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. United States v. Nordic Village, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Lane v. PenaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. College Savings Bank v. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by121 opinions

  1. Sossamon v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. Dennis Walker v. BeardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  3. Blackie Alvarez v. Jean HillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  4. Jachetta v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  5. Garnica v. Washington Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2013

116 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API