Legal Opinion
Aycock v. Tillman
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided December 9, 1913No. 5137PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Complaint; from city court of Monroe — Judge Stone. March 8, 1913.
1Opinion of the CourtPottle, J.
The following notice given for the purpose of recovering attorney’s fees on a promissory note was a sufficient compliance with section 4252 of the Civil Code: “Georgia, Walton County. To W. R. Tillman: You are hereby notified that in accordance with the provisions of the act approved Dee. 12, 1900, I intend to bring suit to the next quarterly term, 1913, of the city court of Monroe, in said county, upon a certain note made by you, dated the 12th day of January, 1912, payable the 1st day of January, 1913, which, among other things, obligates you to pay, besides the principal and interest, ten…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Edenfield v. Bank of MillenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
- Baskins v. Valdosta Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
3Cited by5 opinions
- Pierce v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
- George P. Tobler v. Yoder & Frey Auctioneers, Inc., Cross-Appellee, Chemical Bank, Intervenor-Appellee Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Tobler v. Yoder & Frey Auctioneers, Inc.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1978
- Collins v. Savannah Guano Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
- Burch v. Atlantic Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927