Legal Opinion
Pierce v. Jones
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided March 5, 1927No. 17241PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.
1. Where the defendant in a suit upon a promissory note which is unconditional in so far as it relates to the payment of tne principal and interest, and conditional in so far as it relates to the payment of attorney’s fees, seeks in his answer to defeat in part the plaintiff’s claim for principal and interest, the answer should be. verified as to the allegations made for that purpose. Where, as in the present case, the answer is not so verified, and the plaintiff interposes a demurrer to the answer, based upon several grounds, one of which is that the answer is not verified, and where the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Rylee v. Bank of StathamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
- Ward v. Frick Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1895
- Pape v. Woolford Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
- McKibben v. Fourth National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- Phelps v. Belle IsleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Walden v. BarwickCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1945
- Jones v. PierceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- Lunsford v. HoweCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
- Callaway v. Hopkinsville Milling Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
- Hayes v. HannahCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.