Legal Opinion

Puget Sound Power & Light Co. v. Asia

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided April 1, 1921No. 236PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NETERER, District Judge.

This cause is before the court upon the motion of the plaintiff for a temporary injunction, and the motion of the defendants to dismiss. On the 12th of March, a decision was filed in this case on a prior application for temporary injunction in which the facts with relation to the contention of the plaintiff is more fully set out. That application was predicated upon cause No. 235 between the plaintiff and the city of Seattle for specific performance, and was to restrain these defendants from prosecuting the action in the state court which it was alleged involved a…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Walla Walla City v. Walla Walla Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Madisonville Traction Company v. Saint Bernard Mining CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Joy v. St. LouisSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Angle v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. Oelrichs v. SpainSupreme Court of the United States · 1872

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ransom v. Dollar S. S. LineDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1933
  2. (PS) Bruzzone v. Intel CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API