Legal Opinion

(PS) Bruzzone v. Intel Corporation

District Court, E.D. California

Decided December 17, 2019No. 2:18-cv-00865Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL A. BRUZZONE, No. 2:18-cv-0865 KJM DB PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 INTEL CORPORATION, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff Michael Bruzzone is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to 18 the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Pending 19 before the undersigned are defendants’ motions to dismiss the second amended complaint and 20 defendants’ motions to declare plaintiff a vexatious litigant. (ECF Nos. 45 & 48.)…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  3. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. Lee v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  5. NORTH STAR INTERNATIONAL, a Nevada Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION, Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API