United States v. Gladney
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Julius Gladney appeals his conviction by jury on three counts of distribution of cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841. Gladney also appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for a new trial and the denial of his motion for release from custody pending appeal. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
The evidence is sufficient to sustain Gladney’s conviction. Although Gladney argues that Henry Grisby’s testimony is unreliable, he has failed to point to any evidence, other than the evidence of Gris-by’s potential bias, that supports this…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. Lewis Tam, AKA Yiu Kwong Tam, United States of America v. Robert Ng, United States of America v. Co GiangCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Jose Juan Ramirez-RoblesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Randolph GeorgeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. John EggeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States of America,plaintiff-Appellee v. Clayton R. Jackson,opinionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Kelly v. J.A.W. Land & Trading LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2013