Legal Opinion

Murphy v. City of Tacoma

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1962No. 35748PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonworth, J.

This is an appeal from an order granting the city’s motion for judgment n.o.v. and striking the jury’s awards totalling $10,000 for mental anguish, suffering, discomfort, annoyance and inconvenience in three consolidated actions for damages to appellants’ real property, alleged to have been caused by the acts of the city performed in connection with a public improvement described in this opinion.

This appeal is stated to be “a consolidated appeal on a short record.” The appropriateness of this characterization may seem questionable in view of the fact that the record contains transcripts of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Kincaid v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Gasaway v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Samish River Boom Co. v. Union Boom Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Davis v. Tacoma Railway & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Gadbury v. BleitzWashington Supreme Court · 1925

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Grimsby v. SamsonWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Hunsley v. GiardWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Charlie Stuart Oldsmobile, Inc. v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Smith v. RodeneWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Strode v. GleasonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API