Legal Opinion
Federal Trade Commission v. Scientific Living, Inc.
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 9, 1957No. Civ. A. 5614PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN W. MURPHY, Chief Judge.
This is an application by the Federal Trade Commission, an administrative agency of the United States, pursuant to § 9 of the Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 41-46 and 47-58, see Id. § 49, for an order requiring Scientific Living, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation, having its office and principal place of business in this district, to comply with a subpoena duces tecum of the Commission duly authorized and served on the corporation in the course of an investigation, § 6(a), Id. § 46(a), instituted to ascertain whether or not the corporation was…
2Cases cited66 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Federal Communications Commission v. Pottsville Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Hunt Foods and Industries, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
- Grubb v. GrubbSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Application to Enforce an Administrative Subpœna Duces Tecum of the Federal Trade Commission v. Waltham Watch Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1959
- A. O. Smith Corp. v. Federal Trade CommissionDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1975
- Federal Trade Commission v. Hallmark, Inc., and Ben Cole, Vice President, Hallmark, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1959
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.