Legal Opinion
Application to Enforce an Administrative Subpœna Duces Tecum of the Federal Trade Commission v. Waltham Watch Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 13, 1959PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FREDERICK van PELT BRYAN, District Judge.
This is an application by the Federal Trade Commission, pursuant to Section 9 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 49, to enforce an administrative subpoena duces tecum issued by the Commission and served upon the respondent.
The subpoena, issued on April 24, 1958 and served on April 28, required the respondent Waltham to appear before “Miss Charlotte Maskey, Attorney and Examiner for the Federal Trade Commission at Room 511C, United States Court House, Foley Square, in the City of New York, New York, on the 8th day of May, 1958 * * * to…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Federal Communications Commission v. Pottsville Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Federal Trade Commission v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Hunt Foods and Industries, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
- Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1975
- Federal Trade Commission v. GreenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- Federal Trade Commission v. Hallmark, Inc., and Ben Cole, Vice President, Hallmark, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1959
- Federal Trade Commission v. Hunt Foods & Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1959
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.