Legal Opinion

Michael Murphy v. Ernest Reynolds III

Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)

Decided September 29, 2011No. 02-10-00229-CVPublished

1Opinion of the Court

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-10-00229-CV MICHAEL MURPHY APPELLANT V. ERNEST REYNOLDS III APPELLEE ------------ FROM THE 17TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY ------------ MEMORANDUM OPINION1 ------------ I. Introduction In five issues, a media defendant, Appellant Michael Murphy, brings this interlocutory appeal, asserting that the trial court erred by partially denying his motion for summary judgment. See

Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014(a)(6) (West 2008). We are constrained to reverse and render. 1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. II. Factual and Procedural…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. King Ranch, Inc. v. ChapmanTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Ford Motor Co. v. RidgwayTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Mann Frankfort Stein & Lipp Advisors, Inc. v. FieldingTexas Supreme Court · 2009
  5. MacK Trucks, Inc. v. TamezTexas Supreme Court · 2006

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API