Fowles v. Rupert
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Calhoun; Hopkins, J. Assumpsit by Louis Fowles against Conrad Rupert for breach of a contract to purchase certain hay. There was judgment for defendant, and an order deducting $75 from the taxable costs, from which order defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.
This cause has been before us on a former occasion. The plaintiff had recovered a judgment, which was reversed. See 138 Mich. 150. Another trial has resulted in a verdict and judgment for the defendant, of no cause of action, and items of cost amounting to $75 were deducted to which defendant thinks himself entitled, and has appealed.
The action was begun before a justice of the peace, to recover for a balance for hay sold and delivered and for damages for the alleged refusal of the defendant to receive and pay for a quantity of hay in accordance with a contract between the parties. The…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Fowles v. RupertMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
3Cited by6 opinions
- Knoper v. BurtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1970
- Tishhouse v. SchoenbergMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
- Thompson v. PetersMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
- Kaye v. TaylorNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
- Moskalik v. DunnMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.