CGB Occupational Therapy, Inc. v. RHA Health Services Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
CHERTOFF, Circuit Judge:
This case concerns various Pennsylvania state law claims arising out of a business dispute. It reaches us after a jury returned a verdict in appellee’s favor and the District Court denied appellant’s request for post-trial relief. Among other things, we are obliged to interpret some of the contours of the tort of interference with contractual relations under Pennsylvania law.
Jurisdiction in the District Court was based on 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a), governing an action between diverse citizens involving a claim for more than $75,000. We have jurisdiction…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Caterpillar Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Newman-Green, Inc. v. Alfonzo-LarrainSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Tanner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Pocono International Raceway, Inc. v. Pocono Produce, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Assembly Technology Inc. v. Samsung Techwin Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- Cgb Occupational Therapy, Inc. v. Rha Health Services Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Buffalo Wings Factory, Inc. v. MohdDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2007
- Larry Pitt & Associates v. Lundy Law, LLPDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014