Legal Opinion
Larry Pitt & Associates v. Lundy Law, LLP
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 30, 2014No. Civil Action No. 13-2398PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RUFE, District Judge.
Plaintiff Larry Pitt & Associates (“Pitt”), a law firm, has sued a second law firm, Lundy Law, LLP, and its managing partner L. Leonard Lundy, Esq. (collectively “Lundy Law”), as well as Titan Outdoor LLC (“Titan”), an advertising firm, alleging federal antitrust violations and state law causes of action. Plaintiff voluntarily dismissed its initial complaint after Defendants filed a motion to dismiss, and filed an amended complaint. Defendants again moved to dismiss, and the Court granted that motion in substantial part.1 Plaintiff filed a Second Amended…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Howard Hess Dental Laboratories Inc. v. Dentsply International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- ACUMED LLC v. Advanced Surgical Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Pastore v. Bell Telephone Co. of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Philadelphia Taxi Ass'n v. Uber Technologies, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- 3Shape Trios A/S v. Align Technology, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2020
- SEI GLOBAL SERVICES, INC. v. SS&C ADVENTDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020