Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Assembly Technology Inc. v. Samsung Techwin Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 23, 2010No. Civil Action 09-00798PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

O’NEILL, District Judge.

Assembly Technology Inc. (“ATI”) alleges that Samsung Techwin Co. tortiously interfered with ATI’s contract with a group of third party consultants. On November 16, 2009, 2009 WL 4430020, I dismissed ATI’s amended complaint and granted leave to amend. On December 4, 2009, ATI filed a second amended complaint. Presently before me is Samsung’s motion to dismiss the second amended complaint, ATI’s response and Samsung’s reply. I heard oral argument on February 1, 2010. For the following reasons I will grant Samsung’s motion to dismiss.

BACKGROUND

Samsung…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  4. Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  5. Wilkerson v. New Media Technology Charter School Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. DePuy Synthes Sales, Inc. v. Globus Medical, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. Ozburn-Hessey Logistics, LLC v. 721 Logistics, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Bral Corp. v. Johnstown America Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. ALLEGHENY ENGINEERING COMPANY v. HAVTECH LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
  5. Ditech Holding CorporationUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2023

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API