Legal Opinion

Parziale v. HP, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided April 24, 2020No. 5:19-cv-05363Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 JOHN PARZIALE, 8 Case No. 5:19-cv-05363-EJD Plaintiff, 9 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S 10 MOTION TO DISMISS AND/OR HP, INC, STRIKE Defendant. Re: Dkt. No. 25 g i 13 This putative nation-wide class action suit arises out of Defendant HP Inc.’s (“HP” or 14 || “Defendant”) implementation of a remote firmware update that allegedly incapacitated Plaintiff 3 15 || John Parziale’s (“Plaintiff”) HP printers and thirty-three other models of HP printers by preventing QO 16 || the use…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API