Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Gradford

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 18, 1997No. 1951102PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This Court granted Perry S. Gradford's petition for the writ of certiorari to consider his argument that the affirmance by the Court of Civil Appeals (Gradford v. Nicholas ConcreteEquip. Co., 699 So.2d 145 (Ala.Civ.App. 1996)) conflicts with several cases and statutes regarding a plaintiff's burden of proof. The circuit court instructed the jury that "The burden of proof is upon the plaintiff to reasonably satisfy you bysubstantial evidence" as to Gradford's negligence claim and that "The law requires that the plaintiff prove the material allegations of one or more of his wantonness claims by…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Cage v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Hines v. Riverside Chevrolet-Olds, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  4. Rowden v. TomlinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  5. Ex Parte Bagby Elevator & Elec. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Cackowski v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  2. Hutchins v. DCH Regional Medical CenterSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  3. Richardson v. Liberty Nat. Life Ins. Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1999
  4. Hayes Ex Rel. Estate of Billarreal v. LuckeyDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1997
  5. Edgeworth v. FAMILY CHIROPRACTIC & HEALTHSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API