Legal Opinion

United States v. Doyle

District Court, W.D. Virginia

Decided June 2, 2009No. 2:07CR00004PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

JAMES P. JONES, Chief Judge.

In this criminal case, the defendant, convicted by a jury of possessing child pornography, has filed post-trial motions seeking acquittal and a new trial. For the reasons that follow, I will deny the motions.

I

The defendant Robert Doyle was convicted by a jury of knowingly receiving and knowingly possessing child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. §§ 2252A(a)(2)(A), (a)(5)(B), and (b)(2) (West Supp.2008) (Counts One and Two), and knowingly transporting child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. §§ 2252A(a)(1) and (b)(1) (West Supp.2008)…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Ashcroft v. Free Speech CoalitionSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. RossCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  2. United States v. DoyleDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API