United States v. Doyle
District Court, W.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
JAMES P. JONES, Chief Judge.
In this criminal case, the defendant, convicted by a jury of possessing child pornography, has filed post-trial motions seeking acquittal and a new trial. For the reasons that follow, I will deny the motions.
I
The defendant Robert Doyle was convicted by a jury of knowingly receiving and knowingly possessing child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. §§ 2252A(a)(2)(A), (a)(5)(B), and (b)(2) (West Supp.2008) (Counts One and Two), and knowingly transporting child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. §§ 2252A(a)(1) and (b)(1) (West Supp.2008)…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Ashcroft v. Free Speech CoalitionSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. RossCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- United States v. DoyleDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2009