Legal Opinion

Guerrero v. Wagner

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 24, 1976No. 46201PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Todd, Justice.

The attorneys for Marie Guerrero, widow, achieved a settle ment of her claim for benefits under the Minnesota Workers’ Compensation Act. The settlement, including attorneys fees, was approved by the compensation judge at Duluth, Minnesota. The file was forwarded to the main office at St. Paul. Thereafter, an amendment to the act setting a maximum limit upon the amount of attorneys fees which a compensation judge has authority to approve became effective. Pursuant thereto, the deputy commissioner reduced the attorneys fees which had been approved by the compensation judge herein.…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Franke v. Fabcon, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  2. In Re HubbardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  3. Wangen v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  4. Vang v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  5. Watlow Winona, Inc. v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API