Legal Opinion
Vang v. Commissioner of Public Safety
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided November 29, 1988No. C2-88-1250PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SHORT, Judge.
Respondent’s driving privileges were cancelled and denied pursuant to Minn.Stat. §§ 171.14 and 171.04(8) (1986) and Minn.R. 7503.1800, subpt. 2 (1987) because he had three alcohol-related driving incidents and a special review in approximately &k years. Respondent petitioned for reinstatement pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 171.19 (1986). The trial court ruled that (1) the Commissioner exceeded his authority by promulgating Minn.R. 7503.1300, subpt. 2, and (2) the challenged provision of the rule was unreasonable. The trial court reinstated respondent’s driving privileges, and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Berge v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Lee v. DelmontSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Szczech v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Minnesota-Dakotas Retail Hardware Ass'n v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- State, Department of Public Safety v. MulvihillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wangen v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- Hockey Enterprises Inc. v. Total Hockey Worldwide, LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2011
- Re: Declaring a Negative Need for an Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed Living Word Bible Camp Project.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- Stasny ex rel. Stasny v. Minnesota Department of CommerceCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- Vang v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.