Legal Opinion
Heinicke v. Parr
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided May 24, 1948No. 10600PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Circuit Judge.
The appellant, a veteran of World War II, brought a civil action in the District Court for Southern Ohio against the four appellees, who successfully moved to dismiss on the ground that the complaint failed to state a claim against them upon which relief could be granted. The amended complaint which was dismissed averred *195that the action arises under the Second War Powers Act, as amended, and that jurisdiction of the cause is vested in the United States District Court by section 633, 50 U.S.C.A. Appendix, subsection 2(a) (6) of the T^ct.
The amended complaint alleged that,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hecht Co. v. BowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Porter v. Warner Holding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Bowles v. SkaggsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1945
- Walling v. O'GRADYCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
3Cited by11 opinions
- Shell v. SchmidtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Messick v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1949
- United States v. Universal Management Services, Inc., Corporation Natural Choice, Inc. Corporation, Doing Business as Natural Choice Products, Inc. Paul M. Monea, Individual Paul A. MoneaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Brinkmann v. Urban Realty Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- United States v. Universal Management Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.