Legal Opinion

Rose v. Oehme

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 13, 1948No. 33078PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVISON, V.C.J.

This is an action to recover a real estate broker’s commission for the sale of a farm. The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court.

Plaintiff, B. C. Rose, testified that he was a broker, and that about the 1st of April, 1945, the defendant, Paul Oehme, employed him to effect an exchange of defendant’s farm for city property; that he took a Dr. Bonifield out to look at the farm and that he introduced defendant to Bonifield, who at that time had a home in Sayre, Okla., to trade, but that no trade was consummated; that about six months later, defendant…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Harris v. OwenbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. J. L. Lemmon Co. v. OppenheimerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  3. Ludeman v. EnglishSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  4. King v. StephensonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  5. Oklahoma Railway Co. v. MountSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stiers v. MayhallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  2. Graham v. BishopSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  3. Carr v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  4. Hughes v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API