Legal Opinion

Western States Construction, Inc. v. Michoff

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1992No. 19793PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*933OPINION

By the Court,

Young, J.:

Appellant Max Michoff (“Max”) and respondent Lois Michoff (“Lois”) cohabitated for approximately nine years, although they were never married. They formed Western States Construction, Inc. during their relationship. Lois provided valuable services in the operation of the business based on Max’s representations that she was a co-equal owner. When they terminated their relationship, Lois brought this action seeking one-half of the parties’ assets. The district court entered judgment in favor of Lois and against Max and Western States Construction, Inc. For the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Marvin v. MarvinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Hay v. HayNevada Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Smith v. Recrion CorporationNevada Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Pandelis Constraction Co. v. Jones-Viking AssociatesNevada Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Ravera v. City of RenoNevada Supreme Court · 1984

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Salzman v. BachrachSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  2. Breliant v. Preferred Equities Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Brown v. Kinross Gold U.S.A., Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2008
  4. Estate of Shapiro v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  5. Pittman v. Lower Court CounselingNevada Supreme Court · 1994

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API