Legal Opinion

Estate of Shapiro v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 22, 2011No. 08-17491PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge SILVERMAN; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge TASHIMA.

OPINION

SILVERMAN, Circuit Judge:

Bernard Shapiro and Cora Jane Chenchark lived together for twenty-two years, but they never married. Over those twenty-two years, Chenchark cooked, cleaned, and managed their household. When they broke up, she filed a palimony suit against him in state court. While the suit was pending, he died. In the context of this tax refund lawsuit filed by Shapiro’s estate, the district court held that Chenchark’s homemaking services did not, as a matter of law, provide sufficient…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Shakur v. SchriroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. Marvin v. MarvinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Evelyn Jenkins v. County of Riverside Kenneth B. Cohen, in His Official CapacityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  4. Yanez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  5. Carroll v. LeeArizona Supreme Court · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Marshall Naify Revocable Trust v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  2. Estate of Gertrude Saunders v. CirCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  3. Booke v. County of FresnoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2015
  4. Wichansky v. ZowineDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2015
  5. Estate of Saunders v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2011

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API