Legal Opinion

Madill v. Michigan National Bank

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1942No. Docket No. 56, Calendar No. 41,814PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, J.

On May 10, 1938, plaintiffs, J. Dale Madill, Irene Isabelle Madill, and Clara Day Madill, borrowed the sum of $11,200 from the Saginaw State Bank, whose successor is the Michigan National Bank, the defendant. As security for this loan plaintiffs executed a mortgage upon property in the city of Midland, which mortgage was recorded without payment of the mortgage tax. The mortgage contained a statement that it was to be insured by the Federal housing administration, and, because of 3 Comp. Laws 1929, § 3641, as amended by Act No. 14, Pub. Acts 1935 (Stat. Ann. § 7.422), was not subject to the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Detroit Trust Co. v. AgozzinioMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  2. MacDonald v. BettsMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Markoff v. TournierMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Fox v. JacobsMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Windisch v. Mortgage Security Corp. of AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ypsilanti Charter Township v. KircherMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Carpenter v. SmithMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Two Men & a Truck/International Inc. v. Two Men & a Truck/Kalamazoo, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1997
  4. Carpenter v. SmithMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. United States v. Deutsche Bank National Trust CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API