Legal Opinion
Detroit Trust Co. v. Agozzinio
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided June 7, 1937No. Docket Nos. 142, 143, Calendar Nos. 39,434, 39,435PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, J.
This cause has already been here on appeal on the question of the validity of service of summons. See Detroit Trust Co. v. Doe (Agozzinio), 276 Mich. 507. The question now involved is: “Where, in foreclosure of mortgages by advertisement, the statute (3 Comp. Laws 1929, § 14429) provides that the sale shall be at public vendue to the highest bidder, is it a compliance with the statute where sale is struck off on one bid to a representative of the mortgagee without competition1?”
The trial judge said:
“It appears in the mortgage advertisement that the sale was specified at a certain date and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Leland v. FordMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
- Manhattan Taxi Service Corp. v. Checker Cab Manufacturing Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Markoff v. TournierMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
- Moss v. KearyMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
- Page v. KressMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Rose v. National Auction GroupMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
- Sweet Air Investment, Inc v. KenneyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
- Worthy v. World Wide Financial Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2004
- Cramer v. Metropolitan Savings & Loan Assoc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1977
- United States v. GarnoDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1997
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.