Legal Opinion
Cobell v. Norton
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 17, 2002No. CIV.A. 96-1285(RCL)PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
LAMBERTH, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court after a twenty-nine day bench trial to determine whether defendants Gale Norton, Secretary of the Interior, and Neal McCa-leb, Assistant Secretary of Interior for Indian Affairs, should be held in civil contempt of court. After carefully reviewing of all the evidence presented and representations made at trial, the record in this case, and the applicable law, the Court finds that these defendants are in civil contempt of court. The Court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are detailed below.
I. INTRODUCTION
The…
2Cases cited125 opinions
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
120 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Cobell v. NortonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Cobell, Elouise v. Norton, GaleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
- Cobell, Elouise v. Norton, GaleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- In Re: BrooksCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- Cobell, Elouise v. Norton, Gale A.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.