Legal Opinion

Cobell, Elouise v. Norton, Gale

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided July 18, 2003No. 02-5374PublishedCited by 92 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by Chief Judge GINSBURG.

GINSBURG, Chief Judge:

Beneficiaries of Individual Indian Money trust accounts, as a class, sued the Secretary of the Interior and other federal officials, in their official capacities, for breach of fiduciary duty in the management of those accounts. In an earlier appeal, we affirmed the district court’s holding that the officials, who serve as trustee-delegates for the federal government, had breached their fiduciary duties, and we remanded the case to that court for further proceedings. Cobell v. Norton, 240 F.3d 1081 (D.C.Cir.2001)…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Marrese v. American Academy of Orthopaedic SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by92 opinions

  1. Cobell, Elouise v. Norton, GaleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
  2. United States v. Philip Morris USA Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
  3. Cobell v. NortonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
  4. Charlesbank Equity Fund II v. Blinds to Go, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
  5. ChartOne, Inc. v. BerniniCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004

87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API