Minnesota Elevator, Inc. v. Imperial Elevator Services, Inc.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ARLANDER KEYS, United States Magistrate Judge.

Currently before the Court is Plaintiff Minnesota Elevator, Inc.’s (“Minnesota’s”) Motion for Summary Judgment. Fed. R.Civ.P. 56. Minnesota argues that summary judgment is warranted, because Imperial Elevator Services, Inc.’s (“Barnard”) only defense to Minnesota’s breach of contract claim 1 fails as a matter of law. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs Motion is Granted.

BACKGROUND PACTS

Since 1971, Minnesota has manufactured, installed, and serviced various types of elevators and elevator parts. Minn. Fact Stmt,…