Legal Opinion

Kuhar v. Thompson Manufacturing

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided February 17, 2022No. 20200584-CAPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

2022 UT App 22

THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS NICHOLAS KUHAR AND JULIE KUHAR, Appellants, v. THOMPSON MANUFACTURING INC. AND XYZ CORPORATIONS, Appellees. Opinion No. 20200584-CA Filed February 17, 2022 Third District Court, West Jordan Department The Honorable Kristine Johnson No. 190900751 Matthew Weng, Colin P. King, and Paul M. Simmons, Attorneys for Appellants Robert L. Janicki and Michael L. Ford, Attorneys for Appellees JUDGE MICHELE M. CHRISTIANSEN FORSTER authored this Opinion, in which JUDGES RYAN M. HARRIS and RYAN D. TENNEY concurred. CHRISTIANSEN FORSTER, Judge: ¶1 Nicholas and Julie…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. MacRis & Associates, Inc. v. Neways, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Rupp v. MoffoUtah Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Murdock v. Springville Municipal Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. SheehanCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kuhar v. Thompson ManufacturingCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2022
  2. Kuhar v. Thompson ManufacturingUtah Supreme Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API