Connecticut Blue Cross, Inc. v. White
Connecticut Superior Court
1Opinion of the Court
This is a consolidated appeal from a decision of Paul B. Altermatt, insurance commissioner, allowing the plaintiff, hereinafter called Blue Cross, a 5.61 percent rate increase in premiums for certain direct payment plans. Two appeals were taken from this decision, one under § 33-167 of the General Statutes and the other under § 4-183 (b), as amended by Public Acts 1973, No. 73-620 § 13. By agreement of the parties the appeals were heard, and are to be decided, together.
On August 13, 1973, Blue Cross, pursuant to § 33-166 of the General Statutes, filed with the commissioner a request for…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Malone v. SteinbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Hardware Mutual Casualty Co. v. PremoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Rommell v. WalshSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States v. SladeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- Rizzo v. PriceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- National Council on Compensation Insurance v. New Mexico State Corp. CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
- National Council on Compensation Insurance v. New Mexico State Corp. CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1988