Legal Opinion

Bowles v. Sigel

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided March 7, 1946No. Civil Action No. 619PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DONOVAN, District Judge.

Plaintiff commenced action for treble damages and an injunction under Section 205(e) of the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942, as amended, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix § 925(e). The complaint is of the customary type used in this sort of proceeding. Defendant’s motion to make the complaint more definite and certain is directed at paragraphs 6, 7, 8 and 9, which are summarized as follows:

Paragraph 6 alleges defendant’s failure to post selling prices prior to November 20, 1945;

Parargraph 7 alleges defendant offered for sale and sold commodities in excess of maximum prices;

Paragr…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Best Foods, Inc. v. General Mills, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1943
  2. Bowles v. National Erie Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. Bowles v. OhseDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1945
  4. Bowles v. SchultzDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1944
  5. Raudenbush v. Baltimore & O. R. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1944

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rudolph Wurlitzer Co. v. AtolDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1952
  2. A. C. Taylor, of the Estate of E. L. Martin, (Also Known as EFF Lynch Martin), Deceased v. H. C. OrtonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API