Legal Opinion

Opinion of the Justices

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 2, 1931PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

To the Honorable Senate:

The undersigned, justices of the supreme court, make this answer to the question submitted us under your resolution with reference to Senate Bill No. 3.

The bill is entitled “An Act Providing for assistance to the aged.” A law making age the only test of relief would be void for a number of reasons.

It would violate the constitutional provision about pensions. (Const., Pt. I, art. 36). By the constitution, “Pensions are not to be granted except in consideration of actual services and never for more than one year at a time. A pension ordinarily suggests the idea of a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Canaan v. Enfield Village Fire DistrictSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1908
  2. Morrison v. ManchesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1879
  3. State v. GriffinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1896
  4. In Re School-Law ManualSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1885
  5. State v. PennoyerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1889

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Heydenreich v. LyonsIllinois Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Cloutier v. State Milk Control BoardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1942
  3. Newland v. ChildIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Kansas Gas & Electric Co. v. City of Independence, Kan.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
  5. New Hampshire Municipal Trust Workers' Compensation Fund v. FlynnSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API