Legal Opinion

Bramall v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 1, 1978No. Civ. 19265PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TAMURA, J.

Petitioner filed a workers’ compensation claim for injuries she sustained in an automobile accident while en route to her home from her place of employment. The workers’ compensation judge found that the injury occurred in the course of employment but the board, on reconsideration, determined that the homeward trip was governed by the normal “going and coming” rule and vacated the judge’s decision. Petitioner seeks review and annulment of the board’s decision. We have decided that the circumstances of this case bring it within the dual purpose exception to the “going and…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. LeVesque v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Hinman v. Westinghouse Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Garza v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Hinojosa v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Dimmig v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Santa Rosa Junior College v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Price v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Baroid v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  4. C. L. Pharris Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  5. Perez v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API